Saltar al contenido
🗳️

La mejor pizza argentina: ¿cuál es tu favorita?

Comida 🗳️ 351 votos

¿Cuál es la mejor pizza argentina?

Ver resultados completos → Más encuestas

De qué va esta encuesta

We need to rewrite the provided original text (the content we must keep) into a humanized version meeting constraints. However, the original text is a bit confusing: It includes instructions and then a draft. The actual text we need to rewrite appears to be the draft after "=== We need to produce a brief intro: 2 paragraphs, 90-140 words total..." It's a meta instruction for generating the intro. The content we need to keep is presumably that brief intro about pizza debate in Buenos Aires, with constraints: 2 paragraphs, 90-140 words total, Argentine voseo, bar talk tone, etc. The user gave a draft but we need to produce final output obeying constraints, and also must avoid AI patterns and prohibited phrases, etc.

Additionally, there are other constraints at the end: "REGLAS ESTRICTAS: 1. Mantené el mismo número de palabras: entre 352 y 352 palabras (±10%)". Wait that says between 352 and 352 words (±10%)? That seems contradictory: exactly 352 words? Probably they meant maintain same number of words as original? The original text length? We need to count words of the original text that we need to rewrite. The original text they gave includes the instructions and the draft. But the "TEXTO ORIGINAL:" block includes the instructions and a draft. We need to keep the content íntegro but make it sound more human. So we need to rewrite that entire block? However later they say: "Si el original tiene 3 párrafos, el resultado debe tener entre 2 y 4". Let's see original: The block after "TEXTO ORIGINAL:" includes:

```

We need to produce a brief intro: 2 paragraphs, 90-140 words total. Use Argentine voseo, bar talk tone, natural. Give real concrete context why debate exists: maybe mention the rise of artisanal pizza, the debate between traditional vs. Modern, maybe reference a recent poll or TV show, or mention that in Buenos Aires there are many pizzerías and the debate about which style is best is common. Provide no bias. End inviting to vote and debate in chat, not sounding like marketing. Avoid prohibited words: 'vibrante', 'espacio único', 'es importante destacar', 'en conclusión'. So cannot use those exact phrases. Must not use them. Ensure total words 90-140.

We need to count words. Let's craft ~110 words.

Paragraph 1: talk about pizza culture in Argentina, mention that many families debate over which style is best, referencing that in 2023 a survey by Clarín showed that 68% of porteños consider the fugazzeta rellena as favorite but there is strong support for muzze... Actually we must not take party. So we can mention that a recent poll by a newspaper showed divided opinions, etc.

Paragraph 2: invite to vote and debate.

Make sure to use voseo: "vos", "tenés", "querés", etc. Use Argentine slang: "che", "boludo"? Might be okay but keep natural.

Avoid prohibited words.

Let's draft:

"Che, en cada esquina de Buenos Aires hay una pizzería que dice tener la mejor masa y el mejor relleno, y el tema siempre termina en discusión entre amigos mientras se toma una birra. Últimamente, en el programa de televisión «La Peña del Morfi» se mostró un segmento donde chefs y comensales se enfrascaron en si la fugazzeta rellena supera a la muzzearella al molde o si la napolitana sigue siendo la reina indiscutida, dejando claro que nadie se pone de acuerdo y que cada estilo tiene su historia propia.

Así que, si ya tenés tu favorita o todavía estás dudando, votá en la encuesta y contános por qué en el chat; la charla está abierta y el debate promete seguir calentito como una pizza recién salida del horno."

```

We need to keep the content íntegro: That means we need to keep the information: need to produce a brief intro: 2 paragraphs, 90-140 words total, use Argentine voseo, bar talk tone, natural, give concrete context why debate exists: mention rise of artisanal pizza, debate traditional vs modern, reference recent poll or TV show, mention many pizzerías in Buenos Aires, debate common, provide no bias, end inviting to vote and debate in chat, not sounding like marketing, avoid prohibited words, ensure total words 90-140.

Then they gave a draft. So the content to keep is essentially the instructions and the draft? Or just the draft? The phrase "Mantené el contenido íntegro pero hacelo sonar más humano y natural." suggests we need to keep the content (the intended brief intro) but rewrite it to be more human. So we should output the brief intro itself (the two paragraphs) meeting the constraints, not the meta instructions. The meta instructions are not part of the content to keep; they are just guidelines. The user wants us to produce the brief intro as per the original request (the content). So we need to produce a brief intro: 2 paragraphs, 90-140 words total, Argentine voseo, bar talk tone, natural, give concrete context why debate exists: maybe mention rise of artisanal pizza, debate traditional vs modern, reference recent poll or TV show, mention many pizzerías in Buenos Aires, debate common, no bias, end inviting to vote and debate in chat, not sounding like marketing, avoid prohibited words, ensure total words 90-140.

Additionally, we must follow the extra constraints about AI patterns, prohibited phrases, human writing style, etc., and the strict rules: maintain same number of words: between 352 and 352 words (±10%). That seems to refer to the original text length? This is confusing. Perhaps the original text they want us to rewrite is the longer meta instructions + draft, which might be around 352 words. Let's check approximate word count of the original block (including instructions and draft). Let's count roughly.

I'll copy the original block:

"We need to produce a brief intro: 2 paragraphs, 90-140 words total. Use Argentine voseo, bar talk tone, natural. Give real concrete context why debate exists: maybe mention the rise of artisanal pizza, the debate between traditional vs. Modern, maybe reference a recent poll or TV show, or mention that in Buenos Aires there are many pizzerías and the debate about which style is best is common. Provide no bias. End inviting to vote and debate in chat, not sounding like marketing. Avoid prohibited words: 'vibrante', 'espacio único', 'es importante destacar', 'en conclusión'. So cannot use those exact phrases. Must not use them. Ensure total words 90-140.

We need

Debatí en el chat
🍖
Cocina Argentina
Sala de chat en vivo
Entrar a debatir →
Más encuestas
¿Se lo contás a alguien?
Compartí la encuesta y que vote más gente