¿Cuál es el sabor de helado más argentino?

We need to produce a rewritten version of the original text, which was a brief intro 2 paragraphs, total 90-140 words, in Argentine voseo, bar chat tone, natural, providing real context why ice cream flavor debate in Argentina, with a specific datum, referencing cultural or moment, not taking side, ending inviting to vote and debate in chat, not marketing. No prohibited words.

But we also have a massive set of constraints: The system says we need to rewrite the original text to avoid AI detection. Also we have a rule: "Mantené el mismo número de palabras: entre 325 and 325 words (±10%)". Wait, the original text is short (90-140 words). But the constraints now say we need to keep the same number of words: between 325 and 325 words (±10%). That seems contradictory. Actually it's a pattern: The user gave a prompt that includes both the original request and then a set of patterns to eliminate, and then says "REGLAS ESTRICTAS: 1. Mantené el mismo número de palabras: entre 325 and 325 words (±10%)". That seems to be a mistake: they want the rewritten text to have same number of words as original? But they say between 325 and 325 words (±10%) which is exactly 325 words. That seems like they want 325 words exactly (allow ±10% => 292-357). But original target was 90-140 words. There's a conflict. However we must follow the latest instruction: The system says "REGLAS ESTRICTAS: 1. Mantené el mismo número de palabras: entre 325 and 325 words (±10%)". That likely is a generic instruction for rewriting tasks, but we need to adapt to the specific task. Usually in these tasks, they want us to keep the same approximate word count as original. The original target was 90-140 words. So we should aim for that range. But the strict rule says 325 words. Which to follow? The system says we must follow the developer's instructions. The developer gave the overall instruction: "Sos un editor de medios argentino que humaniza textos generados por IA. Tu trabajo es reescribir para que supere cualquier detector de IA sin cambiar el contenido." Then they gave CONTEXTO DEL TEXTO: maintain content, make it more human. Then they gave the original text request: "We need to produce a brief intro (2 paragraphs, total 90-140 words) in Argentine voseo...". Then they gave PATRONES DE IA QUE DEBÉS ELIMINAR COMPLETAMENTE... And then REGLAS ESTRICTAS... The strict rules include maintaining same number of words between 325 and 325 words (±10%). That seems to be a generic rule for any rewriting task, but it's inconsistent with the specific request. However we must obey all instructions; if contradictory, we need to reconcile. Probably the intention: they want the rewritten text to have same number of words as the original (which they said 90-140). But then they gave a template with 325 words mistakenly. In many similar tasks, they say "Mantené el mismo número de palabras: entre 90 and 140 words (±10%)". But they typed 325 erroneously. Since the original request is about 90-140, we should aim for that.

Thus produce 2 paragraphs, total words between 90-140, voseo, bar chat tone, natural, include specific datum, not take side, end inviting to vote and debate, no prohibited words, no AI patterns.

We need to avoid prohibited words list: includes "vibrante", "espacio único", "es importante destacar", "en conclusión", etc. Also avoid "Además", "Por otro lado", "Sin embargo", "En conclusión", "Asimismo". Also avoid filler phrases like "Es importante destacar", "Cabe mencionar", etc. Also avoid "puede ser / podría / es posible que" more than once.

We must avoid repetitive paragraph lengths (almost identical). So make paragraphs of very different length: maybe one short (1 sentence) and one longer.

We need to use voseo, with "vos", verb forms like "tenés", "sabés", "querés". Use "che". Use parentheses for conversational asides.

We need to include a specific datum: e.g., "Según el último informe de la Cámara de la Industria del Helado, en enero de 2025 el sabor más vendido fue dulce de leche granizado con un 22% del total, seguido de cerca por maracuyá al 19%". Must keep that datum.

We need to list options? The original said: "¿Cuál nunca falta en tu pote argento?" Options listed. Probably they expect to list some flavors: dulce de leche granizado, maracuyá, maybe chocolate, frutilla, etc. But we can just mention the debate.

We need to end inviting to vote and debate in chat, not marketing: e.g., "Andá a votar y contános en el chat por qué elegís ese sabor, sin vueltas."

We must not use prohibited words like "vibrante", "espacio único", etc.

We need to ensure no markdown, just plain text with line breaks.

We need to avoid AI patterns: no repetitive paragraph lengths, no "Además"/"Por otro"/"Sin embargo"/"En conclusión"/"Asimismo". No "puede ser / podría / es posible que" more than once. Avoid filler phrases. Avoid three perfectly balanced examples in a list. Avoid repeated subject at start of consecutive sentences.

We need to alternate rhythm: paragraphs of very different lengths, within each paragraph alternate long and short sentences.

We need to include rhetorical questions placed in middle without immediate answer.

We need parenthetical conversational asides that differ.

We need to present opinions as certainties without hedge.

We need to integrate voseo organically.

We need to avoid repeating same closing expression.

Let's craft.

Paragraph 1: maybe 2-3 sentences, mix long and short.

Paragraph 2: longer, maybe 4-5 sentences.

We need total words 90-140. Let's aim for ~115.

We'll count.

Draft paragraph 1:

"Che, en las esquinas de Buenos Aires el helado es tema de barra tanto como el fútbol: ¿cuál sabor nunca falta en tu pote argento? Según la Cámara de la Industria del Helado, en enero de 2025 el dulce de leche granizado lideró con un 22 % de las ventas, mientras que el maracuyá le pisó los talones con un 19 %